2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (360 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Commander | Cruze |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2685 mm |