2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 187 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Jeep | Cadillac |
Model | Commander | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 6200 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 397 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.4 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 2713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 117 L |