2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 Dodge AVENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge AVENGER is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Dodge AVENGER. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Commander | 2013 Dodge AVENGER | |
| Make | Jeep | Dodge |
| Model | Commander | AVENGER |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4892 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2064 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2765 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.2 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |
