2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 558 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (542 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Jeep | Dodge |
Model | Commander | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 5700 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 367 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1449 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2946 mm |