2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Sierra weights approximately 29 kg more than 2008 Jeep Commander.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Sierra (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Jeep | GMC |
Model | Commander | Sierra |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 6000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 355 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 2439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1872 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3645 mm |