2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 877 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | Commander | Countryman |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 47 L |