2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost weights approximately 140 kg more than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost (780 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost | |
Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Commander | Ghost |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 780 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 2495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5569 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1948 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3465 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 82 L |