2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 659 kg more than 2013 Volvo C70.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Commander | C70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2640 mm |