2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 651 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Jeep | Studebaker |
Model | Compass | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2008 | 1960 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 68 L |