2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1963 Renault 8
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1238 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Compass | 1963 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Compass | 8 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 38 L |
