2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Compass | Elan |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2358 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 45 L |