2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1964 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,694 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (243 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Compass. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 579 kg more than 1964 Maserati Mistral.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Maserati Mistral. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 1964 Maserati Mistral | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | Compass | Mistral |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 3694 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 243 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2410 mm |