2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1965 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 899 kg more than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 1965 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
Model | Compass | 1500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2358 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 40 L |