2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1179 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Compass | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Compass | 4 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2358 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 60 L |
