2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1071 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Compass | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Compass | 323 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 45 L |
