2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1982 Mazda 121
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. Both 2008 Jeep Compass and 1982 Mazda 121 are equipped with a 1,968 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Mazda 121.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 121. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 1982 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Compass | 121 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2520 mm |