2008 Jeep Compass vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 179 kg more than 1996 Renault Megane.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Compass | 1996 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Compass | Megane |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2358 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2490 mm |
