2008 Jeep Compass vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 643 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Compass (224 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (178 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Compass | Covie |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 50 L |