2008 Jeep Compass vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 327 kg more than 2008 Jeep Compass.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Jeep Compass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2008 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2008 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Compass | Ranger |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Crossover | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3010 mm |