2008 Jeep Compass vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Compass. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 118 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Compass | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Compass | MPV |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Crossover | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2358 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 75 L |