2008 Jeep Compass vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Compass. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Compass.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Compass | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
| Model | Compass | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 184 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 7.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1359 mm |
