2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 934 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Jeep | Riley |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | RM A |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2169 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2870 mm |
