2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1562 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Elite |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 29 L |