2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 893 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (453 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 453 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2540 mm |