2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1478 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (453 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 453 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2060 mm |
