2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1966 Seat 1500
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 818 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1966 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 1500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2660 mm |