2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 433 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |