2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 312 kg more than 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Camargue |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 107 L |