2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
