2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1164 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1979 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1979 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 626 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2209 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2520 mm |