2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1981 Mazda 323
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1128 kg more than 1981 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (453 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1981 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 323 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1069 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 453 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2370 mm |