2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 502 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1828 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
