2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1992 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 2,685 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1425 kg more than 1992 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Suzuki Alto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Suzuki Alto. (60 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1992 Suzuki Alto | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Alto |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2685 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3310 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2180 mm |
