2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1993 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 448 kg more than 1993 Nissan Cima.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1993 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Cima |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
