2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 984 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (500 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2830 mm |
