2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 803 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (500 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Compass. (319 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Jeep | Jeep |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Compass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 203 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2209 kg | 1406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2660 mm |
