2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 168 kg more than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (400 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | XL7 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1828 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 64 L |
