2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 219 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (425 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (346 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Endeavor |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 425 Nm | 346 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2069 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 81 L |