2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 574 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (425 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Torque | 425 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2069 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 82 L |
