2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 497 kg more than 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Jeep | Fisker |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Karma |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 36 L |
