2008 Jeep Patriot vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Patriot. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Patriot would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Patriot weights approximately 681 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2008 Jeep Patriot is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Patriot will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Patriot (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Patriot | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | Patriot | Cooper |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 50 L |