2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1961 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 754 kg more than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. (186 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1961 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Jeep | Reliant |
Model | Wrangler | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 179 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 38 L |