2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,777 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (196 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (315 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Wrangler | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3777 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2540 mm |