2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 808 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (322 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Wrangler | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 322 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |