2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1965 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1965 Wartburg 312. (36 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1965 Wartburg 312.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Wartburg 312. 2008 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1965 Wartburg 312 has manual transmission. 1965 Wartburg 312 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1965 Wartburg 312 | |
| Make | Jeep | Wartburg |
| Model | Wrangler | 312 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 36 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 78 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 43 L |
