2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1966 Marcos 1500
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1500 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 860 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1500.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Marcos 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Marcos 1500. (131 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Marcos 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1966 Marcos 1500 | |
| Make | Jeep | Marcos |
| Model | Wrangler | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Torque | 297 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.5 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2290 mm |
