2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 610 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |