2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1974 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 330 kg more than 1974 Mercury Comet.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mercury Comet. (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1974 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Wrangler | Comet |
Year Released | 2008 | 1974 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2630 mm |