2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1980 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 700 kg more than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2040 mm |