2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 475 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (258 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | Wrangler | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 297 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |